<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;And I feel Fine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/</link>
	<description>Thoughts of a moderately strange (yet not harmful) primary care physician.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>The earnings vary widely, depending on: 1. The part of the US that the doctor works in - the reimbursement for even Medicare varies widely depend on this.  2.  The payor mix - Medicare (for Seniors) and Medicaid (for the poor) pay much less than private insurance, and the insurance contracts vary from doctor to doctor.  3.  The ages of the patients - pediatric patients pay differently (less in general) than older patients.  4. The complexity of the visits - 25 ear infections is different than 25 diabetic rechecks.  You bill differently based on this.  

But, to answer your question, the average family doctor with an even mix of all of these in an average part of the country would earn from $120K-$140K seeing 25/day (that is my best guess).  Perhaps that is a little high, but it is not far off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The earnings vary widely, depending on: 1. The part of the US that the doctor works in &#8211; the reimbursement for even Medicare varies widely depend on this.  2.  The payor mix &#8211; Medicare (for Seniors) and Medicaid (for the poor) pay much less than private insurance, and the insurance contracts vary from doctor to doctor.  3.  The ages of the patients &#8211; pediatric patients pay differently (less in general) than older patients.  4. The complexity of the visits &#8211; 25 ear infections is different than 25 diabetic rechecks.  You bill differently based on this.  </p>
<p>But, to answer your question, the average family doctor with an even mix of all of these in an average part of the country would earn from $120K-$140K seeing 25/day (that is my best guess).  Perhaps that is a little high, but it is not far off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 01:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>Hi Dr Rob, I&#039;m from south asia and have no idea about the health care system in USA.I wanted to know how much a physician earns if he sees 25 pts per day. Is the pay any different from when you sees medicare pt vs young insured pt. Thanks in advance for the reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dr Rob, I&#8217;m from south asia and have no idea about the health care system in USA.I wanted to know how much a physician earns if he sees 25 pts per day. Is the pay any different from when you sees medicare pt vs young insured pt. Thanks in advance for the reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>I am glad I could ruin things.

The funny thing is, despite the fact that this &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; our reality, some don&#039;t believe me.  My experience is entirely practical.  Reading your blog, you have nothing to worry about.

As far as appt types, the other thing we did was get rid of most of our appointment types.  We have new peds, new adult, established peds, and established adults.  That made things much easier and made the rest possible.  It took some working with the EMR to make it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad I could ruin things.</p>
<p>The funny thing is, despite the fact that this <i>is</i> our reality, some don&#8217;t believe me.  My experience is entirely practical.  Reading your blog, you have nothing to worry about.</p>
<p>As far as appt types, the other thing we did was get rid of most of our appointment types.  We have new peds, new adult, established peds, and established adults.  That made things much easier and made the rest possible.  It took some working with the EMR to make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Furst - Wait Times</title>
		<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Furst - Wait Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>Fantasic post Rob,
Hospitalist - FYI we use the exact same models as Rob.  His plan works for specialist or generalist because he hasn&#039;t instituted open-access for everything I think.  Open-Access works if you have very low variability in appt types, chronic care isn&#039;t needed and you can muster 30-50% additional personal to handle the variation in appointment need (compared to allowing waiting lists).  Rob has a combo of block booking and open-access and that&#039;s why it works well.  BTW Rob -- you&#039;ve summed up pretty much every post of my blog in a single post -- thanks a lot now I&#039;ll have to take the blog down. Ian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantasic post Rob,<br />
Hospitalist &#8211; FYI we use the exact same models as Rob.  His plan works for specialist or generalist because he hasn&#8217;t instituted open-access for everything I think.  Open-Access works if you have very low variability in appt types, chronic care isn&#8217;t needed and you can muster 30-50% additional personal to handle the variation in appointment need (compared to allowing waiting lists).  Rob has a combo of block booking and open-access and that&#8217;s why it works well.  BTW Rob &#8212; you&#8217;ve summed up pretty much every post of my blog in a single post &#8212; thanks a lot now I&#8217;ll have to take the blog down. Ian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>Baby&#039;s good to me, you know
She&#039;s happy as can be, you know
She said so
I&#039;m in love with her and I feel fine

(And I personally adore my primary care doc - can&#039;t imagine getting by without him.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baby&#8217;s good to me, you know<br />
She&#8217;s happy as can be, you know<br />
She said so<br />
I&#8217;m in love with her and I feel fine</p>
<p>(And I personally adore my primary care doc &#8211; can&#8217;t imagine getting by without him.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBTAM</title>
		<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>TBTAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/#comment-1157</guid>
		<description>At least you didn&#039;t use the dead parrot sketch. 

Kidding aside, I cou&#039;dnt agree with you more on the urgent care visits. I learned a lesson from my dentist on that one - see them just for the urgent issues, and have them come back for the annual. Most patients are exceedingly grateful to be seen on the day they call. 

I do make an exception, however, for the patients I see out of network who pay cash for their visits. (about 20% of my practice at ths point). If I see them for an urgent problem, I will do whatever they need. I am their happy slave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least you didn&#8217;t use the dead parrot sketch. </p>
<p>Kidding aside, I cou&#8217;dnt agree with you more on the urgent care visits. I learned a lesson from my dentist on that one &#8211; see them just for the urgent issues, and have them come back for the annual. Most patients are exceedingly grateful to be seen on the day they call. </p>
<p>I do make an exception, however, for the patients I see out of network who pay cash for their visits. (about 20% of my practice at ths point). If I see them for an urgent problem, I will do whatever they need. I am their happy slave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>See my &lt;a href=&quot;http://distractible.org/2007/07/20/a-day-in-the-office-with-emr/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt; on how my day goes with EMR.

I see an average of 25 patients per day, 4.5 days per week.  Plus I see an average of 15 walk-in clinic patients per week.

We use an EMR and use templates.  We are mostly done with our notes at the end of each visit, but I usually have a few to follow-up on.  We do not dicatation

We always limit the number of concerns for the work-in or walk-in visits (this is necessary).  The routine visits have no such limit. 
If they want to add on concerns to this type of visit (to &quot;trick us&quot; into doing a regular visit), we make them schedule a longer visit.  The HPI and PMH are free text typed, while the rest is templated.

Honestly, the biggest thing for us was that our system was easily scaled up and the addition of more physicians did not add much incremental cost.  This is when I saw the biggest gain in my income - when my relative overhead dropped, as most of my  overhead is fixed and not variable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See my <a href="http://distractible.org/2007/07/20/a-day-in-the-office-with-emr/" rel="nofollow">previous post</a> on how my day goes with EMR.</p>
<p>I see an average of 25 patients per day, 4.5 days per week.  Plus I see an average of 15 walk-in clinic patients per week.</p>
<p>We use an EMR and use templates.  We are mostly done with our notes at the end of each visit, but I usually have a few to follow-up on.  We do not dicatation</p>
<p>We always limit the number of concerns for the work-in or walk-in visits (this is necessary).  The routine visits have no such limit.<br />
If they want to add on concerns to this type of visit (to &#8220;trick us&#8221; into doing a regular visit), we make them schedule a longer visit.  The HPI and PMH are free text typed, while the rest is templated.</p>
<p>Honestly, the biggest thing for us was that our system was easily scaled up and the addition of more physicians did not add much incremental cost.  This is when I saw the biggest gain in my income &#8211; when my relative overhead dropped, as most of my  overhead is fixed and not variable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcb</title>
		<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>pcb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>Dr. Rob,

How many patients do you see, on average, in a day?

How long is your workday?

Do you do your doumenting along the way or let it build up due to time constraints? What about patient calls, lab results, etc?  (If it builds up, how much time spent after clinic hours finishing your work?)  

Are you dictating?  Using templates?  Free type?  How do you think other doctors would rate your notes?  (concise, high signal/noise ratio, yet containing the &quot;essence&quot; of the visit and your thinking?)

How well are you able to stay &quot;on schedule&quot; in your practice?  Do you aggressively limit how many patient concerns you will address on a given visit?  

I think your model sounds ideal, but I suspect there are some devils in the above details, given my experience trying to carve out similar sanity in our practice.  

Or maybe you&#039;ve found nirvana.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Rob,</p>
<p>How many patients do you see, on average, in a day?</p>
<p>How long is your workday?</p>
<p>Do you do your doumenting along the way or let it build up due to time constraints? What about patient calls, lab results, etc?  (If it builds up, how much time spent after clinic hours finishing your work?)  </p>
<p>Are you dictating?  Using templates?  Free type?  How do you think other doctors would rate your notes?  (concise, high signal/noise ratio, yet containing the &#8220;essence&#8221; of the visit and your thinking?)</p>
<p>How well are you able to stay &#8220;on schedule&#8221; in your practice?  Do you aggressively limit how many patient concerns you will address on a given visit?  </p>
<p>I think your model sounds ideal, but I suspect there are some devils in the above details, given my experience trying to carve out similar sanity in our practice.  </p>
<p>Or maybe you&#8217;ve found nirvana.  <img src='http://distractible.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: optoblog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Private Practice is Not Dead</title>
		<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>optoblog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Private Practice is Not Dead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>[...] will it ever die, but I personally think solo private practice is going the way of the Dodo. This primary care physician makes a great case for how to save primary care (hat tip to Kevin, MD), but you&#8217;ll notice he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will it ever die, but I personally think solo private practice is going the way of the Dodo. This primary care physician makes a great case for how to save primary care (hat tip to Kevin, MD), but you&#8217;ll notice he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://distractible.org/2008/04/08/and-i-feel-fine/#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>Happy:  To some extent it is the Wal-Mart model (although I cringe to say it).  Wal-Mart uses computers to control stock and responds to where there are needs.  In some ways I am simply responding to demand.  The simple math says that a 5 Minute visit for $50 is more profitable than a 20 minute visit for $100.  Plus, there are no labs to follow-up on, etc.  The hourly rate for the complex patients is significantly less than that of the simple problem.   It is a flaw of the system, but it is the reality.

We do enough of the quick visits that we don&#039;t feel the need to rush the complex ones.  In a sense, they subsidize the complex care we offer.  Plus, they greatly increase loyalty in the patients we have.  They love our practice because they can get seen.

AnnR hit the nail on the head in that we want the working people coming to our practice and try to make it easy for them.  I think internists need to market themselves to the well and not just the sick.  To do so, however, they need to adjust their schedules to that of the target market.  The simple way to do this is to schedule a sick visit work-in for every complex patient visit.  Then when you are waiting on labs, EKG&#039;s, etc, you can go see the sick person.  Plus, you have something to fall back on if the complex patient no-shows (which is far more likely than a same-day scheduled sick patient).  With Medicare doing what they do, I don&#039;t think internists can survive without doing this.

Again, for me about 70% of my schedule is pre-booked (not including walk-in hours), and the rest is same-day or walk-in visits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy:  To some extent it is the Wal-Mart model (although I cringe to say it).  Wal-Mart uses computers to control stock and responds to where there are needs.  In some ways I am simply responding to demand.  The simple math says that a 5 Minute visit for $50 is more profitable than a 20 minute visit for $100.  Plus, there are no labs to follow-up on, etc.  The hourly rate for the complex patients is significantly less than that of the simple problem.   It is a flaw of the system, but it is the reality.</p>
<p>We do enough of the quick visits that we don&#8217;t feel the need to rush the complex ones.  In a sense, they subsidize the complex care we offer.  Plus, they greatly increase loyalty in the patients we have.  They love our practice because they can get seen.</p>
<p>AnnR hit the nail on the head in that we want the working people coming to our practice and try to make it easy for them.  I think internists need to market themselves to the well and not just the sick.  To do so, however, they need to adjust their schedules to that of the target market.  The simple way to do this is to schedule a sick visit work-in for every complex patient visit.  Then when you are waiting on labs, EKG&#8217;s, etc, you can go see the sick person.  Plus, you have something to fall back on if the complex patient no-shows (which is far more likely than a same-day scheduled sick patient).  With Medicare doing what they do, I don&#8217;t think internists can survive without doing this.</p>
<p>Again, for me about 70% of my schedule is pre-booked (not including walk-in hours), and the rest is same-day or walk-in visits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
